Was Muhammad delusional that Islam or the Quran is based on an illiterate man or controlling men after him, putting their thoughts and ideas into God's mouth?

If it was dictated by this unlettered man (Peace be upon him), then it begs the question why didn’t Quran spend more time speaking about him. Why does the Quran spend the most time speaking about a man named Moses (as) that lived at least 2000 years before Muhammad (saw) (14–15th century Before Christ B.C) on a different continent, N.Africa? That is very strange. Why would Quran mention a man who lived 600 years before him, Jesus, more than himself? Why does Quran continuously debunk the idea that God has a son in multiple places? Why would Quran dedicate an entire chapter on the story of Joseph (Yusuf), who lived over 2600 years before him? Why does Quran mention Adam so many times, more than Muhammad (Saw). Why does Quran have complete love for Abraham and a chapter is named after him? Quran goes so far as to call this man Abraham an entire nation. The Quran should have praised Muhammad more, and called him an entire nation. Shouldn’t he spend time explaining his own ideology rather than telling stories of people that lived centuries even millennium before him? Obviously the one who wrote it is trying to tell us a pattern within the stories. A predictable pattern that humans play. History does repeat itself.

If you say he copied from parts of the Bible, Torah then you are clearly lying because it contradicts those texts in many areas. It is more detailed in explaining some stories. If he did take out the ‘good’ of both texts, then how does he know which one is ‘good’ and which one is ‘bad’ to leave out for future audience? How does he know the moral significance of the stories? How could a desert illiterate Arab know it will be significant after 1400 years? I dare you to compare those Prophets mentioned in the Quran, in the Bible, and Torah side by side and see what they say. The differences will baffle you.

Why would he give honor and respect to a family that is not directly related to him? Although they share lineage through ancestry DNA, it is not obvious.

Allah (God) did choose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,- (Surah Al-Imran, 33)

Why not honor his own Mother? Why does he honor not only Mary, the mother of Jesus, but her entire family? This seems very strange. He was in complete love over a family that he never met, while debasing and according to Abu Lahab (Surah al-Masad) destroying the teachings of his own forefathers/tribe. His own Arab tribe tried to assassinate him while he praised Prophets that he never met, and lived in different land called Jerusalem. He was placing his own life on the line for this. But even still he had this strange love for Mecca, and was almost had an obsession to turn his face to that direction of that city during the most loved act for him, prayer. He was also weeping when he was forced to leave his city due to sanctions and persecution.

Why does the tone in the Quran give the impression that someone is speaking to someone else? It has sentences like “if they ask you concerning…then say…?” No one writes like that. You are only a messenger Muhammad. Why does it downplay Muhammad’s (Saw) authority over the Quran? Why does Quran praise the Creator while decreasing the authority of Muhammad (Saw)? If you compare Prophet’s speech with the Quran it is obvious it has a different tone, style, flow. A professional stylometry test can reveal this. They did it with Shakespeare, then you can do it for a 1400 old text that is still relevant today.

His story clearly showed he was not after power, fame, money, women, possessions, recognition. He was presented with it all and he replied “if you give me the sun on my right hand and the moon on my left, I will not stop my message” i.e. If you gave him all the power and the things of this world, he would not stop what he was doing. He was on a mission that far surpassed his limited existence.

“Or do they say: “He (Prophet Muhammad) has forged it (this Quran)?” Nay! They believe not! Let them then produce a recitation like it if they are truthful.” (Quran 52:33-34)

Is head transplant possible?

No, human head transplants are not possible - and they will not be possible for the foreseeable future. Not if one would want the head to be able to actually control the body supporting it.

This is what makes it impossible:

The above is a cross section of single spinal nerve bundle under a scanning Electron Microscope (because EM photos can only be dichromatic the colours are computer generated - hence the red at the center, a blood vessel, is added later). Every circular shape is a myelin sheath (think of a cable insulation) encasing a neuronal axon (think of a cable wire), originating somewhere in the central nervous system and aiming at a particular sensory or kinetic (muscle) target. And the spinal cord contains a great number of these bundles, with millions of axons in total.

No light microscope can achieve such magnification, mind you, an electron microscope would be needed. And observing a tissue sample under the electron microscope means that tissue is already dead, its micro-shape imprinted on a thin layer of metal (usually silver) and all traces of the original tissue dissolved before sliding its mold alone under the electron beam. The process of preparing the specimen usually takes several hours, if not days, to complete. In other words, such an image is impossible to generate in an operating theater. And even if it were possible, it would still not matter because neither human nor surgical robot can operate at this scale.

The best a neurosurgeon could do today, in an attempt to connect the two ends of a severed spinal cord, would be to try to identify major regions of the severed segments, guesstimate the location of the contained bundles (about as effective as ignoring them) and push the two pieces together. Hoping that the supporting Schwann cells, that generate the myelin and do neuronal repairs in the peripheral nervous system, will try to seal together the opposing axons - even if they are mismatched, incompatible and lack the targeted growth signals to guide their regeneration.

If such a mismatched connection were possible to work, people who have suffered spinal cord trauma would had regained the use of their body a long time ago - and reattaching the two severed ends of the same spinal cord would be a much easier task. We all know that, unfortunately, this has not been the case and spinal cord injuries are not yet repairable.

A spinal cord is millions of times more complex than a car but, in order to illustrate this, imagine sawing a car in half - and then simply pushing together and …duct-taping the two halves externally. What are the chances of that car ever working again? That would be a crude approximation as to why we cannot fix spinal cord injuries.

Now, how about if you take two halves from different cars? Because that would be a simplified approximation of the claims of head transplants made by the notorious Italian doctor. Declaring it a “success” after trying it on a cadaver is like duct-tapping together half a TOYOTA and half a BUICK and then claiming your attempt to be successful - without ever bothering to turn your contraption on!

Nowadays it is not be very hard to connect the major arteries, reattach the spinal column segments and their ligaments and stitch up the muscles and skin. Supporting the head’s tissues with oxygen, nutrients and blood circulation has been a perilous yet routine operation for some time. That is why, ever since 1959, it has been possible to attach a second head to an animal: this works because the original head is still in place and is the one controlling the body.

The insurmountable obstacle, however, still is making the correct connections to the millions of spinal nerve axons - that will not even match in number, let alone shape, size and location - in order for the head to be able to sense and take control the new body.

What are some interesting facts about the Milky Way?

1. The Milky Way is very old

At present, the scientific community believes that the age of the universe is about 13.7 billion years. However, scientists have also discovered that the Milky Way may be one of the earliest galaxies formed in the universe. This is based on the discovery of a 13.5-billion-year-old star in the galaxy (number J0815 + 4729) It is calculated that the star should also be one of the earliest formed stars in the universe. The heavy elements contained in the star through spectral analysis turned out to be only one millionth of the sun, indicating that this star was almost not in the universe when it was formed. Heavy elements.

2. The Milky Way is annexing small galaxies

Scientists have discovered that there are two smaller satellite galaxies on the edge of the Milky Way-the large and small Magellanic Clouds. There is reason to believe that many stars in these two galaxies are being attracted by the gravitational field of the Milky Way. Scientists believe that the size of the large and small Magellanic Clouds It used to be much larger than it is now, but due to the weak gravitational field of the galaxy, its own stars are constantly detached. Understanding the evolution of the large and small Magellanic Clouds can know the future changes of the Milky Way.

3. 200 billion stars are unobservable

In the universe, the Milky Way is only a medium-sized galaxy. Scientists have calculated that there may be 200 to 400 billion stars in the Milky Way, but humans can only observe about 250 billion stars at most. Most of the stars cannot be directly detected because of their orbits. Observed, but most of these stars are obtained by the Milky Way through the merger of other small galaxies, and the galaxies are also used to maintain enough material to produce stars.

4. The Milky Way is distorted

In the photos of the Milky Way we have seen, it is a plate-shaped spiral galaxy. Now, astronomical observations have found that the Milky Way is not a plane from the side, but a somewhat twisted shape at both ends. At the center of the galaxy, a large number of stars have formed. A highlight of the core area.

5. "Bubble" in the center of the galaxy

Scientists have only recently discovered that there are large structures called "Fermi bubbles" at both ends of the Milky Way, formed by the supermassive black hole "Sagittarius A *" in the center of the galaxy, extending up and down about 20,000 light-years. The reason for the formation of these eruptions is still unknown, but it must be related to the large amount of black hole engulfing material.

6. A galaxy merger is taking place in the Milky Way

Mergers between galaxies in the entire universe are very common. The Milky Way is also close to the nearby Andromeda galaxies. In the future, the two galaxies will collide and merge into a larger galaxy. The size of the Andromeda galaxies far exceeds the Milky Way. With one trillion stars, this process of galaxy fusion will continue for billions of years, and the galaxies after fusion will continue to move closer to other galaxies.

7. The position of the Milky Way in the universe

Although the size of galaxies is large enough for humans, the Milky Way is actually only one member of a large-scale galaxy cluster. There are thousands of galaxies around the Milky Way, including the fairy galaxies, to form a larger room. The female galaxy cluster, the entire Virgo galaxy cluster is moving at a speed of 1180 kilometers per second. It can be said that the Milky Way galaxy is not conspicuous in this huge galaxy cluster, and can only be regarded as one of the oldest members.

Understanding the Milky Way can see the operation mechanism of the entire universe. Although the distance between galaxies is far away from each other, they are constantly merging.

What happens when a needle hits the Earth at the speed of light?

The Earth would explode!

And so, of course,

Everyone Dies

---

With classical physics, you would expect nothing to happen.

The mass of an average needle is around 1 gram, or around 0.001 kg.

The mass of our planet is an immense 5.9 x 10^24 kg.

The needle is moving at the speed of light, or around 300,000,000 m/s.

The Earth is moving at a much lower speed, 30,000 m/s.

And if you use conservation of momentum, you will find that there is literally no reaction between the two. Although the needle is moving at such a high speed, the mass of the Earth is so comparatively immense.

However, with relativity, as an object approaches the speed of light, its momentum approaches infinity.

Because of this, it doesn’t matter what the mass or velocity of the object the particle at the speed of light is striking, since it has infinite momentum, the collision will result in a massive loss of kinetic energy.

And such a wave of kinetic energy, combined with the impact of the collision, will probably destroy our planet and all life on it.

So let’s hope that a harmless needle doesn’t suddenly get a grudge against our planet and decide to attack it.

Images taken from Google Search